🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.