‘It’s heartbreaking’: the way thirty confined beluga whales are being used as tools in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, government authorities and animal rights activists.
But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned discussion over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who interact with them daily.
After the Canadian government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling amusement park near the famous falls where they are housed stated it would consider to put them down unless the federal government funds the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are remarkably smart animals – something Kristy Burgess discovered first-hand.
Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a position that involved gaining confidence of the marine predators.
“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and unique traits in their personalities. She developed a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing personalities.
“One whale selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand connection.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s relationship with the whales progressed against a background of growing public opposition to their confinement.
During her time at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, died. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say reflects the inadequate care in which they were maintained.
The park did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the closure. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The park did not respond to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … get far superior health care and constant attention than any human in the Britain, or elsewhere.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility thought particulars of the incident were shared to the press and she was released not long after.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.
“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
She backs demands for the whales to be transferred promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.
In late September, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to export the whales to China.
“Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an transfer that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements reveal a broader incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate
As officials attempt to find a answer, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Inuit communities.
A planned refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has been most controversial. The future facility, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a long term resolution for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ fate.
Others say the possibility of a sanctuary indicates a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable solution in the coming months.
Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|